Investigation of internal and external collusion at a major manufacturer
Anonymised case · Professional reference
Background and challenges
A manufacturer identified substantial abnormal losses in after-sales repairs and used-parts recovery, suggesting organised fraud involving internal and external parties. The long chain of activities, wide geographical scope and concealed evidence made internal evidence collection difficult and hindered the initiation of criminal proceedings.
Approach and implementation
The team combined intelligence analysis, evidence consolidation and legal coordination. Data analysis mapped abnormal transaction networks, group structures and suspected methods. Fragmented information was organised into evidence meeting the requirements for opening a criminal case. The team helped corporate legal staff coordinate with police while preparing civil recovery measures in parallel.
Outcomes
The work helped police open a criminal case and take compulsory measures against principal suspects within a relatively short period. Criminal asset recovery and subsequent civil proceedings recovered substantial losses. The team also helped the company address operational weaknesses and improve internal oversight.
Lessons for international cooperation and governance
The methodology can extend to overseas after-sales networks, cross-border returns of used parts and related-party fraud, providing practical reference for international enforcement cooperation, recognition of evidence and overseas asset recovery.